|
|
Post by Will Wikle on Apr 22, 2009 20:29:44 GMT -5
I survived, yo...
Being on the block against Parker was bittersweet, because on one hand, I knew I had a good chance of sticking around. On the other hand, he really was someone that I felt like I could trust to stick with me, so losing him was hard.
I knew Sarah wouldn't vote to keep me. She owned up to it at least, but... it's going to be harder for me to support her going into this next round. I was already having my doubts about her since I know I was literally the last person on her totem pole of allies. Now that I'm the only one of those people left, I don't feel like sticking my neck out for her is going to be in my best interest. I'm not really going to go against her, or anything. I'm just not going to fight as hard for her as I would have otherwise.
Not that it matters really. Everyone knows I'm the biggest loser when it comes to challenges. I'm fine with that. I actually think that it has helped me in getting to the final 6. People would be stupid to take me out at this point. I'm completely without allies.
For this HOH, I actually think I AM going to throw it. I don't think it's in my best interest to nominate anyone since I've promised both Nathan and Natalie that I wouldn't nominate them, and Daniele is a waste of a week - I'd rather let Sheila or Nathan do that job.
But who am I kidding? I could work on this all day and night and still not win. It's not a matter of "throwing" the challenge anymore. Hehe.
|
|
|
|
Post by Will Wikle on Apr 22, 2009 23:52:52 GMT -5
Ok, I submitted my answers (or guesses, rather) for this HOH. Like I said, I really didn't try too hard to win because I think it's better for me to not be HOH this week. Also, I was pretty sure I wouldn't win anyway. I'm REALLY hoping that Sarah wins this week, because I feel fairly certain that not only would she not nominate me, but that she would probably nominate some combination of Sheila/Nathan/Natalie, and I very much want one of them to go soon. They are all too threatening.
|
|
|
|
Post by Will Wikle on Apr 23, 2009 21:53:03 GMT -5
Surprise, Surprise.... Sheila wins again. It's hard to be doing so poorly in a game where challenges seem to be the deciding factor. I'm a thinker by nature, and when Sheila keeps winning... well, strategy kind of goes out the window. But that doesn't mean I'm not going to try...
I'm trying to appeal to Sheila's sense of logic. But it doesn't appear right now that she cares. She has her hand down everyone's pants and she's jerking off everyone right now. Everyone but me and Daniele. So that's my predicition of who will go up.
If it wasn't a basic guarantee that Sheila was going to win every fucking challenge for the rest of the game, I'd say she was the stupidest person ever. Me and Daniele are the only people who Sheila can hands down beat in a jury vote. She can't beat Sarah, she can't beat Nathan. She could hold her own against Natalie. She's playing an amazing physical game, but a piss poor strategic game.
I might not be able to beat her (or anyone, quite frankly) in a challenge. But I can sure do my best to beat them with my mind. That's my only hope.
JDeanUT (8:39:20 PM): congrats
JDeanUT (8:39:27 PM): I'm impressed.
"Warzone - Sheila Kennedy" (8:39:30 PM): thanks
JDeanUT (8:39:39 PM): I literally had no idea what I was doing in that challenge
JDeanUT (8:39:43 PM): as I'm sure was clear
JDeanUT (8:39:44 PM): hehe
"Warzone - Sheila Kennedy" (8:39:49 PM): LOL
"Warzone - Sheila Kennedy" (8:40:04 PM): Like 5 of the points I got were just complete guesses and just got lucky
JDeanUT (8:40:18 PM): well you did well
JDeanUT (8:40:23 PM): my guesses were still WAY off
JDeanUT (8:40:31 PM): Natalie laughed at me when I told her some of my guesses
JDeanUT (8:40:44 PM): seeing some of the answers now, I understand why
JDeanUT (8:40:44 PM): hehe
"Warzone - Sheila Kennedy" (8:41:39 PM): lol
JDeanUT (8:42:22 PM): well I understand that you'll probably nominate me
JDeanUT (8:42:24 PM): and that's cool
JDeanUT (8:42:37 PM): but I thought I would at least try to appeal to your sense of reason as a strong player
JDeanUT (8:42:46 PM): since I can neither beat you in a challenge, nor in a jury vote
"Warzone - Sheila Kennedy" (8:43:09 PM): well I'm not the most well liked by the jury lol
"Warzone - Sheila Kennedy" (8:43:17 PM): but I'm telling you now that Daniele is my intended target this week
JDeanUT (8:43:23 PM): well if the jury doesn't see that you played a strong game, they're stupid
"Warzone - Sheila Kennedy" (8:43:24 PM): so if you go up it's just that there's not many choices
JDeanUT (8:44:12 PM): well I understand if you put me up. But I do want to stick around a bit longer. I know I'm not going to win, and I've resigned myself to that fact. But I would like to just get a bit further, cause I'm having fun
"Warzone - Sheila Kennedy" (8:44:29 PM): yeah I understand that
JDeanUT (8:45:01 PM): I think there are three people in this house who pose a threat to you winning this game, and I'm not one of them. So I just hope you'll keep that in mind.
|
|
|
|
Post by Will Wikle on Apr 23, 2009 22:05:41 GMT -5
Oh Sarah..... I'm disappointed in that girl. I don't know why, but I just feel it. She's not being loyal. The fact that Sheila is going to nominate me over Sarah (who is stronger in challenge, has more connections on the jury, and has outwardly gone against her in the past), makes me think that they must have some kind of agreement.
Not to mention that she didn't vote to keep me last week. It's hard to support someone who doesn't support you. Sarah and I played in a game together and we kind of got forced onto the wrong side of an alliance - and when things got tough, I was the only one in the game who stood by her. We ended up being the first two jury members. But I was totally with her the entire time.
And now I'm starting to see her for what she is. She's an opportunistic user. She'll do whoever she can to get a little father in a game. Good on her. She's a great player. But I won't let myself fall for her crap again.
|
|
|
|
Post by Will Wikle on Apr 23, 2009 23:35:48 GMT -5
Oh one more thing - for the record... I'm TOTALLY playing dumb. Especially to Natalie. I'm playing a huge airhead card with her. I just want to go on record, because I'm fairly certain that when this is over, I'll read 100 confessionals about how "Will is the dumbest person on earth". I want people to think that. No, I'm not throwing challenges - but I am playing up the fact that I'm a moron.
|
|
|
|
Post by Will Wikle on Apr 24, 2009 19:23:54 GMT -5
On the block again. Saw that one coming. I didn't realize I would be up against Sarah though. I think Sheila's plan this week is actually very smart. If she really does want Daniele out, this is the way to do it.
|
|
